Legal Opinion
Sturm Ruger Co Inc v. Chao, Elaine
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 23, 2002No. 01-5111PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND.
GARLAND, Circuit Judge:
Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, challenging the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s Data Collection Initiative as unlawful. The court concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the complaint, and that the company must pursue its claims through the review process prescribed by the Occupational Safety and Health Act. We agree.
I
We begin with a description of the statutory framework and of prior proceedings…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Jarkesy v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Venetian Casino Resort, L.L.C. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Stokes, Billy v. Cross, StevenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Information Handling Services, Inc. v. Defense Automated Printing ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Secretary of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration v. Excel Mining, LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.