Legal Opinion

People v. Hammons

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1991No. A046535PublishedCited by 5 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DOSSEE, J.

—Defendants were convicted of having stolen jewelry in a store burglary. On appeal, Darby contends that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence burglary loot seized from the car he was driving when the police caught them. Both defendants contend that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a recording of a conversation between them while in custody awaiting arraignment, and in enhancing their sentences on account of a loss to the victim of over $100,000. Hammons additionally contends that the trial court erred in using the standard jury instruction on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. North v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Donaldson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. BlairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. Interest of A.W.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. Napper v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. People v. PlylerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API