Legal Opinion

United States v. James Hillsman and Clinton Bush

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 5, 1975No. 75-1087, 75-1088PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELL, Circuit Judge.

The defendants James Hillsman and Clinton Bush were convicted by a jury of assaulting a federal officer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111. On appeal, the defendants contend that: (1) the indictment should have been dismissed because the officer who was assaulted was not, at the time of the assault, a person designated in 18 U.S.C. § 1114; (2) the district court erred in refusing to instruct the jury that if the defendants reasonably believed the federal officer to be a fleeing felon, the defendants should be acquitted; and (3) the district court erred in admitting certain…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. David LehmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. Don Edward GrimesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. James Earl Young, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. Dœring v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. Herman Tyrone HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Augustin Alvarez, Oscar Hernandez, Mario C. Simon, Rolando Rios, Ramon Raymond, Eduardo Portal, Victoriano Concepcion, A/K/A "Macho"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Sally A. Papia, Russell J. Enea, Joseph v. Basile, and Maximillion J. AdonnisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Steven A. Medina and Ronald CrowderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Wilson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API