Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Hill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 18, 1911No. 1232Published

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; George W. Clark, Judge. Action by J. E. Hurst against W. B. Hill. Judgment for defendant in the district court on appeal from a justice court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

The plaintiff in error, J. E. Hurst, brought suit in a court of a justice of the peace in Oklahoma county, prior to statehood, against W. B. Hill, defendant in error, for breach of warranty in the sale by defendant to plaintiff of an electric motor. He recovered judgment before the justice of the peace, and the defendant appealed to the district court of Oklahoma county. There was there a verdict and judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff has appealed to this court. The plaintiff alleged that he purchased a certain electric motor from defendant, and that at the time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Snow v. Schomacker Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. McGraw v. FletcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Leggoe v. MayerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API