Snow v. Schomacker Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Mobile Circuit Court. Tried before Hon. H. T. Toulmin. This suit was brought by the Schomacker Manufacturing Company, a corporation existing under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, and having its principal place of business in the city of Philadelphia, against Joel II. Snow, for the purpose of -recovering the price of two pianos manufactured by the plaintiff and by it sold to the defendant. The pleadings and facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Mobile Circuit Court. Tried before Hon. H. T. Toulmin. This suit was brought by the Schomacker Manufacturing Company, a corporation existing under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, and having its principal place of business in the city of Philadelphia, against Joel II. Snow, for the purpose of -recovering the price of two pianos manufactured by the plaintiff and by it sold to the defendant. The pleadings and facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. On the trial, the Circuit Court, at the request of the plaintiff, gave to the jury the following charges in writing, to-wit:…
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
In February, 1875, the plaintiff below, appellee here, instituted and commenced the correspondence, which led to the sales of pianos by the Schomacker Manufacturing Company to Snow. Those sales and their stipulations furnish the entire subject of this controversy. All the testimony shows that the sale and delivery of the pianos, about which there is contention, were made and perfected in the State of Pennsylvania. It follows that, as to the obligations of the contract, express and implied, the construction must be determined by the law of the place where the contract was made. — "VYhar.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bolling v. TateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Mudge v. TreatSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Drake v. GloverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
- Pacific Guano Co. v. MullenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tabor v. PetersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Dothan Chero-Cola Bottling Co. v. WeeksAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
- Kennebrew v. Southern Automatic Electric Shock Machine Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Winter & Loeb v. PoolSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Troy Grocery Co. v. Potter & WrightingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.