Legal Opinion

United States v. Hirsch

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 13, 1953No. 276, Docket 22703PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

I. The Government's Appeal:

1. Hirsch was permitted to testify, before the Committee, over objections by the government, about statements made by United States government officials bearing on the value of the property. Whether, as the government contends, this testimony was hearsay — because the statements were ultra vires — we need not consider. For there was sufficient other competent evidence on this matter to sustain the Committee’s finding of value, and as there is no indication that the Committee gave any weight whatever to the alleged hearsay, we conclude that they…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Atlantic Seaboard Corporation, a Corporation v. Madeleine Kneppelhout Van Sterkenburg and Cornelis Kneppelhout Van Sterkenburg, Her HusbandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  2. Bill J. Bishop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  3. United States v. Certain Parcels of Land in City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  4. United States v. 15.03 Acres of Land in the Town of Stratford, Fairfield County, Connecticut Land and Home Development Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  5. Vector Pipeline, L.P. v. 68.55 Acres of LandDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API