Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scott Clabourne v. Charles Ryan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 1, 2017No. 09-99022Published

1DissentBerzon, Circuit Judge

I dissent from the denial of rehearing in this case.

We held the rehearing petition in this case for McKinney v. Ryan, 813 F.3d 798 (9th Cir. 2015) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 39, 196 L.Ed.2d 197 (2016), an en banc opinion of this court issued after our panel opinion, and then ordered supplemental briefing about the impact of McKinney. See Order to File Supplemental Briefs, Clabourne v. Ryan, 745 F.3d 362, 371 (9th Cir. 2014) (No. 09-99022). Ignoring both that briefing and McKinney itself,' the panel majority now refuses to rehear the case. I am convinced that we are obligated…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. SpearsArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Scott Clabourne v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Robert Charles Towery v Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. State v. CañezArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Hedlund v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API