Southern Ry. Co. v. Milan
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Chief Justice.
The Court of Appeals in approving the action of the trial court in giving written charge “3” requested by the plaintiff rested the ruling upon the decision in Birmingham Southern R. Co. v. Harrison, 203 Ala. 284, 82 So. 534, upon plaintiff’s given charge “3” in that case. Clearly enough, charge “3” in the Harrison case, supra, might well have been refused as bad in form by requiring a reference to the pleadings in the cause.
Charges so framed have been frequently condemned. Birmingham Ry. Light & Power Co. v. Fox, 174 Ala. 657, 56 So. 1013 ; Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co. v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. McWhorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Birmingham Southern R. Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- O'Rear v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Pennsylvania Fire Ins. v. DraperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. JerniganSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Wallace v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Rosenbush Feed Co. v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Boykin v. KeeblerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Cottingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.