Legal Opinion

Zumbro, Inc. v. Merck & Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 4, 1993No. 90 C 2507Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is Magistrate Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer's 83-page Report and Recommendation (the “Report”), dated November 13, 1992, which recommends: (1) granting Merck’s motion for summary judgment asserting that all claims of Zumbro’s patent are invalid on account of the inventors’ failure to comply with the best mode requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112; (2) or alternatively, granting Merck’s motion for summary judgment asserting that all claims of Zumbro’s patent are invalid on account of the inventors’ pre-critical date commercial activity (the Unifiber sale)…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API