Legal Opinion

Peek v. Irwin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 13, 1929No. 6993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

The exception is to a judgment refusing a new trial. The proceeding was to probate a will, and caveat was filed. The verdict was for a second time for Irwin, caveator. See Peek v. Irwin, 164 Ga. 450, where a detailed statement of the case may be found.

1. The evidence supports the verdict.

2. Movants for new trial complain of the following charge to the jury: “When a will can not be found after the death of the testator, there is a strong presumption that it was destroyed or revoked by the testator himself, and this presumption stands in the place of positive proof.” This charge is an exact…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scott v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Kitchens v. KitchensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
  3. Wood v. AcheySupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  4. Harris v. CampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  5. Peek v. IrwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lyons v. BloodworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Irwin v. PeekSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API