Peek v. Irwin
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
The exception is to a judgment refusing a new trial. The proceeding was to probate a will, and caveat was filed. The verdict was for a second time for Irwin, caveator. See Peek v. Irwin, 164 Ga. 450, where a detailed statement of the case may be found.
1. The evidence supports the verdict.
2. Movants for new trial complain of the following charge to the jury: “When a will can not be found after the death of the testator, there is a strong presumption that it was destroyed or revoked by the testator himself, and this presumption stands in the place of positive proof.” This charge is an exact…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Scott v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Kitchens v. KitchensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
- Wood v. AcheySupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Harris v. CampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Peek v. IrwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lyons v. BloodworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Irwin v. PeekSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930