Legal Opinion

United States v. Zajanckauskas

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 9, 2003No. CIV.A. 02-40107-NMGPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GORTON, District Judge.

In this denaturalization proceeding, the United States seeks to dismiss defendant’s counterclaim for monetary damages resulting from an alleged breach of contract on the grounds that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

I. Factual Background

The facts stated herein are as alleged in the plaintiffs complaint. Defendant Vla-das Zajanckauskas received his United States citizenship on June 15, 1956 pursuant to a federal statute which requires, in part, an applicant for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Trudeau v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. Boston Regional Physical Therapy, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  4. Aluminum Shapes, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  5. Friis v. McCarthyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API