Legal Opinion

In Re Application of Ny, Susquehanna & Western Rr Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 25, 1957PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Weintraub, C. J.

Appellant railroad applied to the Board of Public Utility Commissioners for permission to discontinue all passenger train service and later amended its application to one for curtailment of service. Following protracted hearings, there was adopted Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 20 “declaring the policy of the Legislature against further abandonment or curtailment of passenger rail service pending the final report of the Metropolitan Rapid Transit Commission.” The Board made its Decision and Order suspending “all further proceedings on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mulcahy v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Holland v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Campbell v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  4. New Jersey & New York Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. General Assembly of State of New Jersey v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Ace Steel Baling, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Enourato v. NJ Building Auth.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  4. Susquehanna Transit Commuters Ass'n v. BD. OF PUB. UTIL. COMM'RSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  5. Matter of Adoption of State Health PlanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API