Legal Opinion

Matter of Adoption of State Health Plan

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 10, 1993PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

262 N.J. Super. 469 (1993)

621 A.2d 484

IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE STATE HEALTH PLAN, N.J.A.C. 8:100, ET SEQ.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 8, 1992.

Decided February 10, 1993.

Before Judges ANTELL, DREIER and SKILLMAN.

Frank R. Ciesla argued the cause for appellant New Jersey Hospital Association (Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, attorneys; Mr. Ciesla, of counsel; Elizabeth Dusaniwskyj and Bryan N. Schulman, on the brief).

Donald M. Palombi, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Department of Health (Robert J. Del…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. In Re the Adoption of Regulations Governing the State Health PlanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  3. DiVigenze v. Chrysler Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  4. Seashore Ambulatory Surg. Ctr. v. Dept. of HealthNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  5. Communications Workers of America v. New Jersey Department of PersonnelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API