Legal Opinion

Altray Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 30, 1966No. C.D. 2726Published

1Opinion of the Court

Bichardson, Judge:

The merchandise of the instant protests, described on the invoices as chocolate covered wafer tree pots, was imported at New York from West Germany and classified in liquidation, in part, as baked articles under 19 U.S.C.A., section 1001, paragraph 733 (paragraph 733, Tariff Act of 1930), as modified in T.D. 54108 with duty at 8% per centum ad valorem, and, in pant, as articles in chief value of artificial stems of visca under 19 U.S.C.A., section 1001, paragraph 1518 (paragraph 1518, Tariff Act of 1930), as modified *61in T.D. 53865 and T.D. 53817 with duty at 50 per centum ad…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Ross Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  3. James Betesh Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Pez Haas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. Quality Marble & Granite Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API