Legal Opinion

State v. Bradley

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1901PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to circuit court, Davison county. Hon. Frank B. Smith, Judge. Joseph P. Bradley was convicted of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors to a minor, and he brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtFuller, P. J.

As a point requiring the reversal of a judgment forfeiting the license of plaintiff in error to sell intoxicating liquors and imposing a fine of $ioo it is claimed by his counsel that more than one offense is charged in the^ following information: “That Joseph P. Bradley, late of the county aforesaid, yeoman, on the 7th day of March, in the year of our Lord 1900, at .the city of Mitchell, in the county of Davison, and State of South Dakota, then and -there did unlawfully sell, furnish, and give away spirituous, malt, brewed, fermented, and vinous liquors to one William Hannett, he,- the said…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. SchweiterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Boldt v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  3. People v. WelchMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. State v. PittmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  5. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KlueberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Garrigan v. KennedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State v. TolleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State v. LaymonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API