Legal Opinion

In re Honey Transshipping Litigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 31, 2015No. Case No. 13-cv-2905PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*859 MEMORANDUM ORDER & OPINION

JOAN B. GOTTSCHALL, United States District Judge

This consolidated matter consists of a class action and a parallel individual action *860(filed by members of the class who intend to opt out) against certain importers and suppliers of commercial honey. The class plaintiffs bring suit for alleged violations of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961, et seq., (“RICO”) against several defendants. Only a few defendants, however, are relevant at this stage of the litigation: (1) Honey Holding I, Ltd.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Swanson v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Indag GmbH & Co. v. IMA S.P.ADistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  2. Vesta Corp. v. Amdocs Management Ltd.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  3. Batton v. The National Association of RealtorsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
  4. Bobb v. Swartz-Retson P.C.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Brandolino v. SchlakDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API