Legal Opinion

O'Hazo v. Sousa, No. 099060 (Jul. 8, 1992)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 8, 1992No. 099060Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs make the following allegations in their complaint. Andrew O'Hazo was driving his car when he was struck from behind by an oil truck operated by defendant Sousa. As a result of this collision, O'Hazo suffered serious injuries. The fifth count asserts a claim for loss of consortium by O'Hazo's two minor children. The sixth count also asserts a claim for loss of consortium by the two minor children, but is grounded in recklessness as opposed to negligence.

The defendants move to strike the fifth and sixth counts on the ground that Connecticut does not recognize an action for loss…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Hopson v. St. Mary's HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Mahoney v. LensinkConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. Hinde v. ButlerConnecticut Superior Court · 1979
  5. Shattuck v. GulliverConnecticut Superior Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API