Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. McGehee v. 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass, Vin: 1G3NF11U9HM234685, Tag: BYX 624

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 2, 1993No. 80393Published

1DissentHansen, Chief Judge

I dissent. I would affirm the trial court.

In its Notice of Seizure and Forfeiture, State served both Michael Shane Sexton and Joe Sexton, Michael’s father. Only Joe Sexton, the Appellee here, answered State’s petition for forfeiture. Joe Sexton alleged he was the owner of the automobile subject to the action and that any use of the automobile by Michael Sexton involving controlled substances was without Joe Sexton’s knowledge or consent.

The State does not controvert that Joe Sexton is the record owner of the automobile. At the forfeiture hearing held in accordance with 63 O.S.1991 § 2-506,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. NesbittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. State ex rel. Moss v. 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, VIN: 1Z373AD431682, TAG: 90 OK RRK-190Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Moss v. Seven Hundred Fifteen DollarsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API