Legal Opinion

Herold v. Washington National Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1937No. Appeal, 164PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The opinion of the learned court below, by Judge Crane, as printed in the Reporter’s Statement, sufficiently answers the assignments of error which relate to the submission of the case to the jury, the refusal of binding instructions on the merits and the refusal to hold that the action was prematurely brought because instituted before seven years had elapsed from the date of the alleged accidental death. To the cases cited in the opinion, supporting the action of the trial judge, may be added, Sunny Point Packing Co. v. Faigh, 63 Fed. (2d) 921, 924; The San Rafael, 141 Fed. 270,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. MettlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. North Pac. Coast R. Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
  3. Harvey v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lukens v. Camden Trust CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  2. In re KerstetterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. In re Wood's EstateAtlantic County Surrogate's Court · 1946
  4. In re Holst, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County1992
  5. Patterson's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Washington County · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API