Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Ranellucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 29, 1976Published

1Dissent

Herlihy, J. (dissenting).

The majority do not contend that the delay in this case of 19 months was in any way attributable to the defendant and they concede that the delay resulted from "prosecutorial inattention”. However, the issue is not merely one of a 19-month delay, and not simply one of prosecutor’s default.

None of the cases cited by the majority indicates that a defendant must simply subordinate his right to a speedy trial to the failings of those who represent the State after he had properly put the court on notice of his insistence on a speedy trial. Furthermore, the right of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People ex rel. Franklin v. Warden, Brooklyn House of Detention for MenNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. People v. ImbesiNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. People v. WallaceNew York Court of Appeals · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API