Lyon & Hoag v. Railroad Commission
California Supreme Court
PROCEEDING in Certiorari to review an order of the Railroad Commission requiring re-establishment of water service. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
Petitioner seeks the review of an order of the Railroad Commission requiring it .to re-establish its service of domestic water in a certain residence district of the city and county of San Francisco known as Lincoln Manor. Petitioner subdivided this tract, and, for the purpose of furnishing domestic water to the purchasers of lots therein, laid water-pipes in the streets thereof, purchased-water from the Spring Valley Water Company, and, by means of a pumping system, distributed it to the purchasers of lots within the tract. As fast as lots were sold and water connections desired for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Brooks-Scanlon Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of La.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Norfolk and Western Railway Company v. Conley, Attorney General of the State of West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- State ex rel. Caster v. Kansas Postal-Telegraph-Cable Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Fellows v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Miller v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District v. PaulsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Grover v. Sharp & Fellows Contracting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947