Legal Opinion

John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Esparza

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 1955No. 12871Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

POPE, Justice.

By trial amendment, filed after the evidence was closed, appellee, Esparza, pleaded that the insurer, through its agent who solicited the reinstatement, knew about Adolfo Esparza’s sickness, and thereby the company, by approving the reinstatement, waived any right to cancellation of the policy because of insured’s physical condition. Our opinion was in error in stating that there were no pleadings of waiver. However, as stated in the opinion, appellee made no request for an issue and none was submitted inquiring whether the insurer waived the fact of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. National Life & Accident InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Federal Surety Co. v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Andrews v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Nu-Enamel Paint Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co. v. HornerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API