Legal Opinion

Auto Trunk Co. v. Hahn

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 1934No. 31,046PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

A rehearing was granted because of the urgent appeals of counsel appearing as amici curice for a modification of the second paragraph of the syllabus and corresponding portion of original opinion (138 Kan. 36, 23 P. 2d 585), wherein it was ruled the trial court committed no error in refusing appellant permission to amend the bond given or to file a new bond. On the rehearing the matter was argued and additional briefs filed, all of which have been duly considered. What is to be written now is somewhat of a repetition of that which has been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Auto Trunk Co. v. HahnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Brockman v. BaymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  3. Culp v. FeyhSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Glover v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Jensen v. City of ChanuteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Russell v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co v. EllisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Grigsby v. CoyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API