Legal Opinion

Fowler v. United States

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided April 5, 1926No. Nos. 355, 356PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATWELL, District Judge.

In 1918 the plaintiffs, as man and wife, each received an income of $88,934.01, subject to taxation under the Revenue Act of that year (40 Stat. 1057); $41,572.90 each were derived from the sale of an oil property, the principal value of which was demonstrated by exploration and discovery work carried on by them. The selling price of this property was $83,-645.80. It had cost $500; $41,822.90, therefore, went to Mr. Fowler, and a like sum to Mrs. Fowler. Each was assessed and paid the sum of $28,502.81 income tax.

There is no dispute between the parties as to the amount…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Edwards v. SlocumSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Cornell v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. American Net & Twine Co. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Newman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  2. Ferris v. Wynn Resorts LimitedDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
  3. InjuryLoans.com, LLC v. BuenrostroDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
  4. Morris v. PompeoDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
  5. Razaghi v. Razaghi Development Company, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API