United States v. 250 Jars "Cal's Tupelo Blossom U.S. Fancy Pure Honey"
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge.
The United States brought a libel proceeding for the condemnation, under Section 304(a) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, as amended, Title 21, U.S.C.A. § 334(a) of a quantity of allegedly misbranded honey, sold by claim*289ant-appellant at one of its stores located in Detroit, Michigan.
Upon stipulated facts, and after argument, the District Court entered an order of condemnation for misbranding of the honey, from which claimant appeals.
It appears that the honey which was condemned was displayed on shelves in appellant’s retail store, on top of which…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Patrol Valve Co. v. Robertshaw-Fulton Controls Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- United States v. an Article of Drug Consisting of 250 JarsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1963
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Allan Drug Corporation, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Vital Health Products, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1992
- Hanson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1976
- United States v. Kasz Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1994
- Gadler v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.