Legal Opinion

Bostick v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 11, 1925No. 16723PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodwobth, J.

“A ground of a motion for a new trial which assigns error on the refusal to exclude evidence, but fails to set out either literally or in substance such evidence, is insufficient to raise any question for decision by this court.” Ga. & Fla. Ry. Co. v. Stapleton, 143 Ga. 46 (1) (84 S. E. 120). “Under repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, each special ground of a motion for a new trial must be complete within itself; and when so incomplete as to require a reference to the brief of the evidence, or to some other portion of the record, in order to determine what was the alleged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilburn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  2. McCall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  3. Roddenberry Hardware Co. v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  5. Georgia & Florida Railway Co. v. StapletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. Moss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Kapplin v. SeidenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. Boatright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API