Legal Opinion
Lauren v. Gollin
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 18, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam J. Sullivan, J.
Plaintiffs move for an order to compel defendant to disclose the following information as demanded in notice dated July 12, 1967 served purportedly pursuant to CPLR 3120:
1. The name (s) and address (es) of each person (s) claimed by the defendant, Leo Gollin, to have witnessed the accident to plaintiffs on October 16th, 1966, which is the subject matter of the within lawsuit, or to have knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the happening of said accident.
2. The identity of the person (s) from whom statements were obtained by the defendant, Leo Gollin, regarding the circum*513stances of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weisgold v. Kiamesha Concord, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1966
- Rivera v. StewartNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Majchrzak v. HagertyNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- In re the Estate of PenninoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
- Sanfilipo v. Baptist Temple, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sadler v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Hartley v. RingNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Whittington v. Rectors of the Church of AdventAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976