Legal Opinion
National Hydro Systems v. Summit Constructors, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 14, 1989No. 88 C 10975PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRIAN BARNETT DUFF, District Judge.
Summit Contractors, Inc. and The Industrial Company of Steamboat Springs, Inc. (“Tic”) have moved to dismiss the complaint of National Hydro Systems under Rules 12(b)(2)-(3), Fed.R.Civ.Pro. In the alternative, Summit and TIC ask this court to transfer this case to the court for the District of Colorado. While this court must deny the motion to dismiss, the court believes that the case indeed warrants transfer pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (1982).
In ruling on a motion to dismiss under Rules 12(b)(2) — (3), the court must resolve the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roberts & Schaefer Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Merit Contracting, Incorporated, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Nagel v. ADM Investor Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- American Commercial Lines, LLC v. Northeast Maritime Institute, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2008
- Lobo v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2006