Legal Opinion

Winton Motor Carriage Co. v. Lindsay Auto Parts Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 12, 1917No. 2893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the East- • ern Division of the Northern District óf Ohio; John H. Clarke, Judge. Suit in equity by the Lindsay Auto Parts Company against the Winton Motor Carriage Company. Decree for complainant, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

Suit for infringement, brought by the Lindsay Company against the Winton Company, on claims 2 and 3 of Lindsay patent, No. 748,760, dated January 5, 1904, on application filed August 18, 1902, covering a rear axle for automobiles. The District Court held both claims valid and infringed, and the defendant brings this appeal.

[ 1 ] The rear axle of an automobile is a shaft which is driven by power, suitably transmitted from the engine, and which, in turn, revolves the rear wheels rigidly attached thereto. Before Lindsay’s time the rear axle had been evolved into a two-part…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cadillac Motor Car Co. v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  2. Ft. Pitt Supply Co. v. Ireland & Matthews Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fleischman Yeast Co. v. Federal Yeast CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1925
  2. Hamilton Mfg. Corp. v. Toledo Guild Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API