Legal Opinion
State v. Austin
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided August 9, 1996No. 95-256Published
1Opinion of the Court
685 A.2d 1076 (1996)
STATE of Vermont
v.
James AUSTIN.
No. 95-256.
Supreme Court of Vermont.
August 9, 1996.
Howard W. Stalnaker and Diane C. Wheeler, Franklin County Deputy State's Attorneys, St. Albans, for plaintiff-appellee.
Robert Appel, Defender General, and William A. Nelson, Appellate Attorney, Montpelier, for defendant-appellant.
Before ALLEN, C.J., and GIBSON, DOOLEY, MORSE and JOHNSON, JJ.
GIBSON, Justice.
Defendant appeals an order of the Franklin District Court that revoked his probation and reinstated his underlying sentence for sexual assault. Defendant contends that: (1) there was…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.