Legal Opinion

The Anaces

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided May 12, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PURNELL, District Judge.

Alexander McCullmn filed his libel in rem against the British steamship Anaces, and, the cause being regularly called, the proctors for respondent moved to dismiss the libel ■ — First, because the libel does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; and, second, because, this court having no jurisdiction to hear this libel in rem, no ‘action in rem would lie. For the purposes of the motion, the allegations set forth in the libel must be taken as true. They are as follows:

*566Alexander MeCullum, a laborer, of the city of Wilmington, state of North…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Grace v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Robertson v. CeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Vandewater v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. The CorsairSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The OnokoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
  2. Lewis v. United Air Lines Transport CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. The AnacesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API