Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Donahue v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1983No. 2-483A114Published

1ConcurrenceNeal, Judge

The maps, aerial photographs, and ground level photographs included in the evidence reveal that Dickey Place is totally engulfed by the vast sprawling industrial complex of Youngstown, which dominates at least a one-half square mile area. In reality, Dickey Place is one of the interior roads used by the plant, and persons doing business there, as an internal route of communication and transportation.

Donahue worked at the Pipe Mill Canteen, located at least one-fourth mile from the Tin Mill clock-out point. Clocking out at the Tin Mill was not prohibited; rather, such behavior was acquiesced…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Russell v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Jeffries v. Pitman-Moore Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. O'Dell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Reed v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. United States Steel Corp. v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API