Legal Opinion

Blochman Commercial & Savings Bank v. Ketcham

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1918No. Civ. No. 2072PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment. The action is based upon an alleged promissory note dated at Ensenada, Mexico. The case is presented upon printed briefs and without oral argument.* Appellant contends that as to certain matters the evidence does not sustain the findings, and as to other matters that the court erred in its ruling at the trial. On both sides the briefs discuss portions of the evidence without furnishing us any quotations therefrom. Only a typewritten transcript on appeal has been filed. In such cases the rule is that we will assume that the parties have printed in their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Diamond Distilleries Co. v. GottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Jones v. American Potash Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Pelton v. San Jacinto Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Stewart v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barker Brothers v. JoosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  2. Cassetta v. BaimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Republic National Bank of Dallas v. StrealyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. First National Bank of Wibaux v. DreherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API