Legal Opinion

Olochnowitz v. Hopmeier-Evans-Gage Agency, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 7, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Yesawich Jr., J.

In March 1988, plaintiff procured a policy of automobile insurance from defendant New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company through defendant Hopmeier-Evans-Gage Agency, Inc. (hereinafter HEG). The policy provided, inter alia, uninsured motorist coverage of $25,000 per person and $25,000 per accident; no separate provision was made for "supplementary uninsured motorist insurance”, commonly known as "underinsured motorist” coverage (see, Insurance Law § 3420 [f] [2] [A]; Reichel v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 66 NY2d 1000, 1002-1003).

In July 1988, plaintiff’s daughter was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cahill v. ReganNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Diemer v. DiemerNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Wied v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Reichel v. Government Employees InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Erwig v. Edward F. Cook Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kershaw v. KershawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API