Legal Opinion

Howard v. County of Emmet

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 16, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Emmet District Court. — Hon. D. E. Coyle, J udge. The opinion states the case. —

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.

— These two actions were by agreement of parties tried upon the same evidence. The one first named was an action in equity to redeem real estate from a tax sale, and the second was an action of certiorari to test the legality of certain proceedings of the board of supervisors of Emmet County in reassessing a special ditch or drainage tax. The only issue presented in both appeals is as to the validity of a certain tax assessed by the board of supervisors against the lands of the plaintiff. The record conclusively shows the following facts: That *529the plaintiff is the owner in fee of the S. % S.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ross v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. Beebe v. MagounSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Polk County Savings Bank v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  2. Selken v. Northland Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  3. Heery v. RobertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. Selken v. Northland Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API