Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 4, 1998No. 21106-8-IIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

Yukie Marshall appeals a jury verdict awarding Verley Hawkins all medical expenses that she claims resulted from an automobile accident caused by Marshall. Although Marshall did not object to the admissibility of documents reflecting the claimed expenses, she later argued she could nevertheless challenge the reasonableness and relevance of each listed expense. The trial court disagreed and instructed the jury that it must award all Hawkins’ claimed damages if they found in her favor. We reverse.

FACTS

In March 1993, Verley Hawkins was a passenger in a vehicle driven by her son. Yukie Marshall’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Fenimore v. Donald M. Drake Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Johnson v. HowardWashington Supreme Court · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ramey v. KnorrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  2. Ramey v. KnorrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. Fox v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Fox v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Erik T. Salisbury, Et Ano, V. City Of Seattle, Et AnoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API