McMoore v. Regan

Petitioner’s primary contention is that the Parole Board failed to .state the grounds upon which it denied him parole. Additionally, he contends that since the denial Avas unlawful he should be granted parole retroactively.

*796In view of .the recent ruling by the Court, of Appeals in People ex rel. Donohoe v. Montanye (35 N Y 2d 221), during ¡the pend-ency of the writ ¡herein, the within proceeding, in my opinion, is no longer summarily disposed of, adversely to petitioner, as urged by respondent, by merely citing Matter of Hines v. State Bd. of Parole (293 N. Y. 254) and the more recently…