Legal Opinion
Cummings v. Regan
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1973PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohn H. Doebb, J.
This is a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLB wherein a judgment is sought directing the respondents to give a meaningful statement of reasons why release on parole is denied.
The original proceeding was brought by petitioner Thomas A. Cummings (“ Cummings ”). Subsequently, Anthony Di Benadetto (“ Di Benadetto”), Charles Loeicero (“Loeicero”), George Whiteneck (“Whiteneck”) and Clarence Calhoun (“ Calhoun ”) petitioned the court for permission to intervene. The application of Calhoun has become moot. The court has signed an order permitting Loeicero and Whiteneck to intervene, their…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Clutchette v. ProcunierDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1971
- United States Ex Rel. John Bey v. Connecticut State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Society Milion Athena, Inc. v. National Bank of GreeceNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rodney R. Haymes v. Paul J. Regan, Commissioner, New York State Parole Board Parole Board of July 29, 1974Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Solari v. VincentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Cummings v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Solari v. VincentNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. FarrNew York Supreme Court · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.