Legal Opinion

Wright v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 16, 1962No. 50529PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, C. J.

— Plaintiff Wright filed his petition against defendant Thompson for declaratory judgment under rules 261 to 269, Rules of Civil Procedure. The trial court sustained defendant’s motions to dismiss the petition and to strike the amended and substituted petition filed pursuant to permission from the court. From judgment accordingly plaintiff has appealed.

No question is raised as to finality of the judgment for purposes of appeal under rule 331, R. C. P. Nor does defendant question plaintiff’s right, under 331(b), to a review upon this appeal of the ruling dismissing the original petition.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  4. Markman v. HoeferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  5. Katz Investment Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Junkins v. BranstadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  2. City of Des Moines v. Des Moines Police Bargaining Unit Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  3. Lewis Consolidated School District v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  4. Green v. ShamaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  5. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. HinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API