Legal Opinion
M. P. & St. L. Express, Inc. v. United States
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided August 12, 1958No. Civ. A. 1028PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
June 27, 1958, M. P. & St. L. Express, Inc., Coastal Leasing Company, Inc., W. L. Swain, Jr., and Robert S. Reese filed this action in this Court, claiming jurisdiction under Section 1336, Title 28 United States Code, seeking to enjoin, annul, and set aside orders of the Inter-State Commerce Commission issued on April 11, 1958, and June 9, 1958, and seeking an interlocutory order authorizing and allowing Herrin Transportation Company, Inc., to take over the managerial control of plaintiff M. P. & St. L. Express, Inc., pending the hearing and determination of this action.
M. P. & St. L.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Federal Power Commission v. Idaho Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Sanford v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- North American Van Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1974
- Hussey v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1965
- A-1 Coach Tours, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1966
- Barnes Freight Line, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Barnes Freight Line, Inc. v. The Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, Ross Neely Express, Inc., Intervenor-Respondent. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Ross Neely Express, Inc., Intervenor-Respondent. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Ross Neely Express, Inc., Intervenor-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978