Legal Opinion

Braunger v. Snow

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1987No. 15339, 15341PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice.

This is a contract action. The primary issues center around the applicability and effect of the statute of frauds. Present also are issues dealing with collateral oral agreements and the admissibility of a pretrial deposition of a party. Specifically, Paul A. Braunger (Braunger) appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment. He also challenges various trial court findings of fact, and a ruling denying his request to admit a deposition of defendant, Jack Snow (Snow), in its entirety. By notice of review, Snow appeals certain trial court findings. We affirm.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Frank Coughlin, Padre Concrete Corporation, A. W. Van Cleave, Jr. And Allied Crushed Stone Company v. Capitol Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,437 Hetty Fey v. Walston & Co., Inc., and Robert A. SpiraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  5. King & King Enterprises, D/B/A King Gas & Oil and Carl R. King, D/B/A King Gas & Oil v. Champlin Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Read v. McKennan HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Amdahl v. LoweSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Coffee Cup Fuel Stops & Convenience Stores, Inc. v. DonnellySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Amdahl v. LoweSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Braunger v. SnowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API