Legal Opinion
Carlos Manuel Balestier-Marrero v. Bradley Booher
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 17, 2026No. 3:25-cv-02155Unknown
1Opinion
| IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA |CARLOS MANUEL BALESTIER- ; No. 3:25-CV-2155 MARRERO, | Petitioner : | (Judge Munley) | BRADLEY BOOHER, | Respondent ; MEMORANDUM | Carlos Manuel Balestier-Marrero initiated the above-captioned action by | filing a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He | challenges his 2018 convictions and sentence entered by the Court of Common | Pleas of Berks County, Pennsylvania. Because Balestier-Marrero filed his | Section 2254 petition well after the relevant statute of limitations expired…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Wood v. MilyardSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.