Legal Opinion

State v. Price

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 27, 1999No. 99-0746-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

¶1. Wisconsin's habitual criminality statute, § 939.62(1), STATS., permits an enhanced sentence if the offender was convicted of a felony or three misdemeanors during the five-year period immediately preceding the commission of the crime for which the offender is presently being sentenced. At subsec. (2), the statute states, "In computing the preceding 5-year period, time which the actor spent in actual confinement serving a criminal sentence shall be excluded." (Emphasis added.)

¶ 2. The issue on appeal is whether confinement time that Tyrone Price spent on various parole holds qualifies as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WittrockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Prue v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Gaertner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Scheunemann v. City of West BendCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  5. Grobarchik v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ClarityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  2. State v. HermanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  3. State v. CriderCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  4. State v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API