Prue v. State

The statement in the judgment “with no good time given” was superfluous but did, perhaps, serve as a warning to the authorities that Prue was not entitled to good time under sec. 53.43, Stats., 1 because he was on probation and not serving a sentence. We point out that while Prue was ordered to spend the first six months of his probation in a county reforestation camp, the law applicable to persons serving a sentence in such camps in respect to good time is the same as that applying to those serving a sentence in county jails. The court under sec. 56.07 (2), 2 is authorized to commit a person…