Legal Opinion

Holt v. Rural Weekly Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 6, 1928No. 26,417PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Defendant published in its paper in the latter part of 1922 what it termed a mystery puzzle and offered a first prize of $1,000 in cash to the contestant who obtained the largest number of points under and pursuant to the rules published with the puzzle. Other prizes were offered but are not involved in this controversy. The first prize was awarded and paid to L. V. France. Plaintiff asserted that he had earned and was entitled to the largest number of points and sued for the amount of the first prize. A verdict was directed for defendant. An alternative motion for judgment or a new…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mooney v. Daily News Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  2. Forsythe v. MurnaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grove v. Charbonneau Buick-Pontiac, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Schreiner v. Weil Furniture Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Sutton v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Holt v. Rural Weekly Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API