Barrow v. Penick
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; Alfred Dillingham Land, Judge. Action by Barrow & Le Blanc against Penick & Ford. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtProvosty, J.
The plaintiffs, Barrow & Le Blanc, sugar planters, sold to the defendants, Penick & Ford, buyers of molasses, their entire crop of molasses of the year 1901 on their Pecan Grove plantation, at 28 cents per gallon, delivery to be .made as manufactured. Deliveries went on under the contract, and payments were promptly made, until defendants rejected a lot of molasses, assigning as a reason that it had been made out of frozen cane, and was unsound. Other shipments that followed were rejected in the same manner until the entire remainder of the crop, 608 barrels, had been similarly rejected.…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Cochran v. Gulf Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- Bankston v. Owl Bayou Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Shreveport Cotton Oil Co. v. FriedlanderSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Nabors Oil & Gas Co. v. McCormickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- Meraux v. Kenilworth Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.