Legal Opinion

Shreveport Cotton Oil Co. v. Friedlander

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 23, 1904No. 15,090PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Third. Judicial District Court, Parish of Bienville; Ben P. Edwards, Judge. Action by the Shreveport Cotton Oil Company against O. O. Friedlander and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, J.

Plaintiff, the Shreveport Cotton Oil Company, brought suit against Friedlander, the defendant, an absentee, for damages in the sum of $7,264.83, and alleged that defendant Friedlander had broken his contract, in which he had bound himself to buy the output of linters, grabbots, and flues of the mill of the plaintiff company for the season of 1900-1901.

*1061Through the process of attachment, and the seizure thereunder of property of one of the defendants, plaintiff obtained judgment.

The defendants answered, and, in addition, pleaded in reconvention. Judgment went against plaintiff on the main…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Almanda & Bro.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
  2. Loreau v. DeclouetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1831
  3. Barrow v. PenickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Howard L. Makofsky, Jr. v. Raymond C. Cunningham, IICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Silverman v. Caddo Gas & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  3. Blodgett Const. Co. v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  4. McLemore v. HemlerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. J. P. Hudson & Sons Co. v. Godchaux Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API