Legal Opinion

Gilling v. Held

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 26, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Hardin District Court. — B. M. Wright, Judge. Action at law to recover on a quantum meruit for alleged services rendered as a cement mason and for certain other services rendered as a carpenter and for certain overtime as a farm laborer. The answer was a general denial, a plea of settlement, and a counterclaim. Verdict for plaintiff, and defendant has appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

bbbok ? refer-grounds of re-Sons: fauuifc" to except. 1. The material facts in the case are not greatly in dispute. The parties were both residents of Ackley, Iowa. The defendant was the owner of a large . „ . ,, _ , , , .¶ farm, situated m North Dakota. In April, 1913, the parties entered into an oral agreement, whereby the plaintiff agreed to render the services of himself and wife to the defendant at $60 per month. They were to go upon the defendant’s farm in North Dakota and keep house *927thereon, and the defendant was to furnish all provisions. The service of the plaintiff’s wife…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carlin v. DaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hess v. Cedar Rapids State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  2. Anderson v. AndersonTuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API