Legal Opinion

Forrest v. Gilchrist

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1896No. 1798PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Lewis County.— Hon. W. W. Langhorne, Judge.

1Per curiam

This action was tried to the court below without a jury, and from the judgment entered upon its findings the case has been appealed to this court.

It appears from the record that, although written notice was given to the appellant, by respondents’ attorneys, of the time of filing the findings of fact and conclusions of law, and also of the judgment, no exceptions were taken to said findings or conclusions; neither were other or different findings requested by the appellant. Under such circumstances this court has uniformly held that it will not review the evidence upon which the findings were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rice v. StevensWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Cook v. TibbalsWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. City of Montesano v. BlairWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Fremont Milling Co. v. DennyWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Stoddard v. Seattle National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Polskie Linie Lotnicze Lot SA v. The Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
  2. State v. MorenoWashington Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API