Legal Opinion
In Re Shuma
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 24, 1990No. 19-20899PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERNARD MARKOVITZ, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court are two motions by Attorney Allen N. Brunwasser (hereinafter “Brunwasser”) filed on behalf of the Debtors, to-wit: 1) Motion To Remove K. Lawrence Kemp As Trustee and Kemp & Kemp, Esquires From These Cases (filed at Motion No. 89-7873M); and 2) Motion To Recuse Judge Bernard Markovitz.
Also before the Court is the Trustee’s Motion To Remove Counsel For Debtors And For Disgorgement Of Fees Paid Him (filed at Motion No. 89-7222M).
The motion to remove the Trustee and his counsel will be denied for failure to show cause as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mitsui Shintaku Ginko K. K., Tokyo v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ex Parte American Steel Barrel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Birdie Mae Davis, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, Edwin Foster, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County, James E. Buskey v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County, Birdie Mae Davis, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, James E. Buskey, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Rapp v. Van DusenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- United States v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re SkobinskyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- In re BennettBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Robert W. Jager and Margaret M. JagerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019